This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage(spill yours?) 22:58, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Advertising for the external link. Minimal credibility, because it's just an ad, so no need for a merge to Architecture in Singapore or some such, and it's a meaningless title, so no redirect. So delete. CDC(talk) 21:05, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. The term gets a couple of dozen Google hits, mainly real estate, but different firms and countries so it's not a neologism. I found it interesting, so I've stubified it. Andrewa 22:01, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Lots of ads for this style of building on Singapore real estate web sites. ---Isaac R 23:38, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep, some notability. Megan1967 06:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep Valid term for an identifiable architectural stye. Dsmdgold 20:23, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.